|
Post by annabanana on Jan 5, 2007 18:07:33 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by beautifulhome1 on Jan 7, 2007 7:12:48 GMT -8
Wow that is really a concern!! NOT!! I personally have nothing to hide but maybe someone plotting a 9/11 might be stopped and a few, like 3,000 lives might have been saved... Wow what a concept. If you are not sending anything illegal or plotting anything illegal you have nothing to worry about, do you?
Again I think this forum should be for issues specific to Mountain Cove like the gate not working, vandalism. I believe your own political bashing is not the spirit of this forum.
|
|
|
Post by cupofjoe on Jan 7, 2007 8:30:58 GMT -8
Isn't it interesting that the Republican Party claims to be the party of personal responsibility and less government intrusion into our lives, yet many of its members continue to blame others for their many failures and snoop into the affairs of private citizens under the guise of "fighting terrorism"? As a democracy it's our right, nay, duty, to question and criticize our leaders and their decisions. I suggest you take a step back and look at the fundamentals of democratic free society. From the San Jose Mercury News 4 January 2007: "Despite the president's statement that he may be able to circumvent a basic privacy protection, the new postal law continues to prohibit the government from snooping into people's mail without a warrant," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the incoming House Government Reform Committee chairman, who co-sponsored the bill...." Bush has tacked on over 750 "signing statements" to bills over the last few years, many of which assert that he has rights that he doesn't really have. For some samples of bills and Bush's "interpretations" of how he does or doesn't have to abide by them, see this Boston Globe article from last April: www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/examples_of_the_presidents_signing_statements/Whatever your political leanings, this should really bother you if you believe that the fundamentals of the US should be based on a democracy.
|
|